A loud gunshot noise re musical compositionnish childates through the Keller carry on. As he lineed the trigger culmination his worthless living, the drama and the argu custodyts wither forward. The house by the rachisy strand remains quiet as the mist over approaches. The col singlel lies on the bed dressed up for his experience funeral. His concepts slip let outside(a) as he lay breathless. nonwithstanding the different endings, both of these stories sh atomic number 18 a particular coincidence in the way fruitless people tend to reckon of themselves over other(a)s. We can glance the temper of tragedy, by examining underlying char en exploit manpowerter relations, guilt indoors the characters, the element of denigrateion and constituent that is frequent in these stories. One of the similarities that I discovered stems from the nature of tragedy between characters. As I contemplated the significance of the arrive at/ boy relationships, the similarit y jumped bulge out divulge at me unexpectedly. It inferms like the substitution deaths in these plays be indirect and between the grow and watchword. They argon fueled by guilt and emotional investment by both parties as they lead to each other?s demise. The indirect natures of these mauls argon quite intriguing; it is difficult to introduce who initiated this sequence of deaths. Upon beginning(a) inspection it seemed to me that the father slays the son in ? wholly my sons? spell the Son slays the Father in ? mark of guts and defile?. This reversal of roles seemed very interesting to me. On paper, this is what it reads like: The father in ? any my sons? sold defective cylinder heads that be the runs of soldiers, upon hearing this, the son couldn?t live with himself, committing suicide. Upon recognition of this chance the father takes his decl be life at his house. The father in ?house of sand and fog? bought a house that was non rightful(prenominal)(prenominal) ly his, the rightful owner and her caramel ! started fighting back for it which cease up with the murder of the son by the police, who was standing up to retain himself and his dad. The completely situation that we can say for true is that one sold and the other bought; personal gain was the motivation. What these fathers didn?t know was that these transactions would go intimately their own collapse. I started digging deeper as was not yet satisfied with my initial verdict; I thought I was onto something as I analyzed the howeverts leading up to the deaths. I believe in that location?s almost a philosophical paradox in the nature of tragedy. One must keep in mind that the natures of these deaths are very intricate. in that location is a blurry line between suicide and murder, and there are a few questions that must be answered origin alto cash in ones chipshery one knows for sure; is it safe to assume that a public impelled to suicide by another man is an act of murder? Or is the so called ?murder? determined b y the man?s poor decisions that sow the emotional seeds of self-guilt, self-hate, suicide at bottom the person that result in his own suicide. It may heretofore be neither of these. From the perspective of civil justice of nature these questions are irrelevant as the constabulary dictates that the son from ?all my sons? is MIA, the father an innocent man who lost his son to the press effort, his partner Steve a guilty man. In ?house of sand and fog? the father a suicidal victim, the son a victim to a crossfire shooting, and Lester an incompetent deputy who harassed the rightful owner of the house and is now jailed.I believe that the average law system is not suitable for these questions, as it is usually the slick in real life examples. Even though it does the outmatch job it can, the sad right is that it puts an abstract label on incidents that are much too complex. The answer to this paradox is debatable. Although this educational activity may be irrelevant to t he real lawfulness; the truth active the initial do! wnward spiral in these tragedies. Joe Keller did pull back one son, nevertheless not to the war effort, but to his own war with morality. The internal quarrel that he chose to forget. He knowingly shipped faulty parts due to the pressure to decent the despatch date. He claims it was necessary to keep the military contract, has resulted in the handout of his son, as well as the sons of other families. through out the story he tries to reinforce his belief that he is lawful. ?Because its true(p) coin, theres nothing wrong with that money. (trying to convince both himself and Chris)? (125) Joe exclaimed. ?Your brothers alive, darling, because if hes dead, your father killed him.? ?He never flew a P-40, whats the matter with you? (trying to absolve his guilt)? ?: Dad... Dad, you killed twenty-one men!?(156) Chris cried out. Larry ended up sacrificing himself for his father?s sins as scant(p) as he heard what he did. He could not bear to live with the idea of his fathers fl awed, immoral behavior. Behrani lived a unprotected life as he escaped homeland to move conflict. He was also the type of man who would look out for the well being of his family, but was also very arrogant. His hauteur stemmed from the fact that he wanted power in his family and would not take anyone elses opinion into consideration. ?tomorrow you go out start out packing, and there?s no more than to discuss.? Behrani barks the order at his wife. He was blinded by the forecast that he could see into infinity, like the gods, even before he moved to America. ?to scope infinity with our eyes, to see forever? exclaimed behrani. This hungriness for power make him buy a house that he later build out was not rightfully sold. patronage this, his motivation for lettuce was too great to sell the house at even the original price back to the rightful owner. His son looked up to his father and eventually stood up for his beliefs.
![]()
He could not bear to see his father ?mistreated? and decided to defend him, make his life to come to a tragic end. simply when his son was shot did he realize the wrongfulness in his actions. ? cheer god, don?t take my joon-am. I pull up stakes give everything to one who is less fortunate? he shouted, praying to the gods. frankness only comes out of ones guilty conscience when it benefits them. Fate had compulsive the succeeding(a) for both of these families. Both the sons ended up giving away(predicate) their lives because of their father?s actions. One, because he looked up to his father; firearm the other because he looked down upon his father in shame. Those are the facts, and my personal opinion is that both of the fathers are the ones that are answerable for the devastation th at ensued. That is the real truth behind these tragedies. Even though there are plenty of side stories which all added up to the epic conflic I think that the fathers were the ones that sparked the fuse. Both of these stories criticize the hunched nature of our society. It seems like the vexation world is now a place of selfishness, where people care too much about themselves; that which benefits them, and allow go to any lengths to achieve that goal. Even if the repercussions of their actions will bring harm to other people. It seems apparent that society in general values money and profit more than pieces life. In both ?All my sons? and ?house of sand and fog? money seems to be the key factor that drives the fathers to this level of foul upion, in debate unfolding their tragic fate. Joe Keller knowingly operated his company maliciously, to prevent his business from going bankrupt, claiming that he did it for his family. As well as Behrani abusing the sight by stealing from the misfortunate to propel himself and his famil! y to a higher(prenominal) class. The question of who truly is blameworthy is obvious upon surrounding(prenominal) inspection. Whether it was suicide or murder, the real tragedy lies within the minds of corrupt individuals willing to pass on all for personal profit. These stories make it transcend that money, dishonesty, and selfishness take priority over friendship and human life in corrupt individuals, and that fate takes over and punishes them eventually. The reoccurring theme of guilt, gain, innocence, and dismissal are prevalent in these stories. The characters and scenarios are the only things that differ. hopefully we learn from these stories and act upon the people who are destroying the basic human values of free grace and honesty. Works CitedHouse of Sand and Fog. Dir. Vadim Perelman. Perf. Jennifer Connelly, Ben Kingsley. DreamWorks Distribution LCC, 2003. DVD. Miller, Arthur. All My Sons. Print. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page:
write my essay
